• BJOG · Jun 2014

    Uterine sutures at prior caesarean section and placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancy: a case-control study.

    • S Sumigama, C Sugiyama, T Kotani, H Hayakawa, A Inoue, Y Mano, H Tsuda, M Furuhashi, O Yamamuro, Y Kinoshita, T Okamoto, H Nakamura, K Matsusawa, K Sakakibara, H Oguchi, M Kawai, Y Shimoyama, K Tamakoshi, and F Kikkawa.
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.
    • BJOG. 2014 Jun 1;121(7):866-74; discussion 875.

    ObjectiveTo clarify the effects of uterine myometrial suture techniques at prior caesarean section on the incidence of pathologically diagnosed placenta accreta in placenta praevia with prior caesarean section (PPPC).DesignCase-control study.SettingEleven tertiary referral hospitals in central Japan.PopulationA total of 98 cases of placenta praevia, a history of one or more prior caesarean sections, and a history of uterine transverse incision and usage of only absorbable thread for myometrial sutures at the prior caesarean section. Exclusions were a history of myomectomy or Strassmann's operation.MethodsCases were grouped into a pathologically diagnosed placenta accreta group (38 cases) and a no accreta group (60 cases). Clinical characteristics including uterine suture methods at prior caesarean section were compared (single-layer versus double-layer closure; continuous versus interrupted sutures in the inner myometrial layer).Main Outcome MeasureThe incidence of placenta accreta.ResultsNo difference was found comparing single-layer with double-layer closure in the incidence of placenta accreta (37.1 versus 39.7%, P = 0.805); however, a significant difference was found comparing continuous with interrupted sutures (58.1 versus 29.9%, P = 0.008). Multivariable logistic regression analysis with stepwise selection for the eight factors meeting the criterion of P < 0.10 in univariate analysis was used, and four independent factors were selected, as follows: gravidity ≥ 3 (adjusted odds ratio, aOR, 3.4, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI, 0.99-11.6, P = 0.050); total praevia (versus non-total, aOR 18.4, 95% CI 3.2-107.0, P = 0.001); anterior/centre placenta (versus posterior, aOR 16.4, 95% CI 3.7-72.2, P < 0.001); and continuous sutures (versus interrupted, aOR 6.0, 95% CI 1.4-25.2, P = 0.015).ConclusionsIn this limited study, a history of continuous sutures on the inner side of the uterine wall showed potential to influence the development of placenta accreta in PPPC patients.© 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.