• Andrew J Kotaska, Michael C Klein, and Robert M Liston.
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Kotaska@bulkley.net
• Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006 Mar 1;194(3):809-14.

ObjectiveRandomized controlled trials suggest epidural analgesia (EA) does not increase the frequency of cesarean births compared with opioid analgesia. We analyzed trials comparing EA with opioid analgesia to determine their external validity in contemporary North American practice.Study DesignRandomized controlled trials comparing EA with opioid analgesia were identified from the Cochrane database and Medline and included if they reported labor outcomes and management protocols. Labor management was then compared with current obstetric practice determined from surveys of North American teaching maternity units and clinical practice guidelines.ResultsOf 19 trials identified, 8 were included. Seven trials used Active Management of Labor protocols that used high-dose oxytocin; each demonstrated no epidural-related increase in cesarean births. One trial that used low-dose oxytocin demonstrated a marked increase in cesarean births. Most large North American obstetric units use low-dose oxytocin.ConclusionRandomized trials showing no effect of EA on cesarean section (CS) rate lack external validity in much of North American practice. The limited data available suggest EA and low-dose oxytocin used together increase the CS rate. Early detection of dystocia and high-dose oxytocin augmentation should be considered for women receiving EA; those delivering in low-dose oxytocin settings should be advised of a probable increase in the likelihood of CS.

13 keywords...

hide…