• Joshua Langford, Gita Pillai, Anthony D Ugliailoro, and Edward Yang.
• Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA. joshua.langford@me.com
• J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Apr 1;25(4):191-5.

ObjectivesThis study was performed to determine the incidence of perioperative lateral wall fractures with a standard sliding hip screw (SHS) versus a percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) using identical meticulous closed reduction techniques in both groups.DesignRetrospective analysis of a prospective trauma registry.SettingUrban Level I trauma center.PatientsOver a 7-year period, 337 patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures were treated with either a SHS or a PCCP at our institution. The PCCP group (Group 1) consisted of 200 patients, of which 141 (71%) had adequate images to be included in the study. The SHS group (Group 2) consisted of 137 patients, of which 100 (73%) had adequate images to be included in the study.InterventionClosed reduction and plate application with either a standard sliding hip screw or a percutaneous compression plate for an Orthopaedic Trauma Association 31A1 or 31A2 intertrochanteric hip fracture.Main Outcome Measure: Radiographic evidence of lateral trochanteric wall fracture as measured by intraoperative and perioperative radiographs.ResultsThere was an overall lateral wall fracture incidence of 20% in the SHS group versus 1.4% in the PCCP group (P < 0.01). For the unstable 31A2 fracture types, there was a lateral wall fracture incidence of 29.8% in the SHS group versus 1.9% in the PCCP group (P < 0.01).ConclusionsOverall, the PCCP group had a significantly decreased incidence of lateral trochanteric wall fracture compared with the SHS group. This difference became greater when just unstable intertrochanteric fractures were analyzed. An anatomic reduction, combined with a device (PCCP) that uses small-diameter defects in the lateral trochanteric wall, essentially eliminates perioperative lateral trochanteric wall fractures.

29 keywords...

hide…