• F Pusch, E Wildling, H Freitag, V Goll, K Hoerauf, and C Weinstabl.
• Clinical Department of Anesthesia and General Intensive Care, University of Vienna, Austria. franz.pusch@univie.ac.at
• Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2001 Jan 15;113(1-2):33-7.

ObjectiveThe cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA), a modified Guedel-type airway with a cuff at the distal end, has recently been introduced into anesthetic practice. The aim of this study was to compare the COPA with the well established laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Special consideration was granted to the difficult airway.Patients And MethodsTwo hundred and fifty-two women of ASA class I or II undergoing elective gynecological or breast surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to either cuffed oropharyngeal or laryngeal mask airway management. Insertion and removal of the device, airway maintenance throughout the procedure, and postoperative course and complications were assessed.ResultsA patent airway was obtained with either device in all patients. Global first-time success rates for insertion were similar in the two study groups. Initial failure of correct placement occurred more frequently in the COPA as compared to the LMA group if the interincisor gap was < 5 cm and mandibular protrusion impossible (p < 0.01). Neither thyromental distance nor Mallampati scores nor body mass index (BMI) were of relevance for insertion success. The incidence of postoperative complaints and of mucosal injuries was significantly higher with the LMA.ConclusionOn the whole, high overall success and low complication rates render COPA and LMA equally suitable for routine anesthetic airway management.

22 keywords...

hide…