• Am. J. Crit. Care · Jan 2016

    Comparative Study Observational Study

    Microbiological Diagnosis of Sepsis: Polymerase Chain Reaction System Versus Blood Cultures.

    • Borja Suberviola, Alicia Márquez-López, Alvaro Castellanos-Ortega, Carlos Fernández-Mazarrasa, Miguel Santibáñez, and Luis Martínez Martínez.
    • Borja Suberviola and Alvaro Castellanos-Ortega are intensivists and Alicia Márquez-López and Carlos Fernández-Mazarrasa are microbiologists at University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain. Miguel Santibañez is an assistant professor, Fundación Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, University of Cantabria, School of Nursing, Santander, Spain. Luis Martínez Martínez is a microbiologist at University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL and an assistant professor, Department of Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain. bsuberviola@yahoo.es.
    • Am. J. Crit. Care. 2016 Jan 1; 25 (1): 68-75.

    ObjectiveTo compare the utility of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction system (SeptiFast) and blood cultures for detecting bacteria and fungi in blood samples from patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.MethodsIn a prospective observational study, whole blood samples for SeptiFast testing and for culture were collected on admission from all patients with severe sepsis or septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit between July 2011 and September 2012. SeptiFast results were compared with blood and other culture results.ResultsThe probability of at least 1 microorganism being isolated at 6 hours was 13-fold higher with the SeptiFast test than with blood cultures (relative risk, 13.5; 95% CI, 5.05-36.06). Unlike culture results, SeptiFast test results were not associated with previous antibiotic consumption. The median time to the first positive blood culture result was 17 hours; SeptiFast results were available in 6 hours. SeptiFast detected genetic material from potentially multiresistant microorganisms in patients whose blood cultures showed no growth at all.ConclusionsThe SeptiFast test provided quicker microbiological diagnosis and identified significantly more microorganisms than blood cultures did, particularly when samples were collected after antibiotic therapy had started or infections were due to resistant bacteria and yeast.©2016 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.