• Gastrointest. Endosc. · May 2014

    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: development of a procedure-specific assessment tool for colonoscopy.

    • Catharine M Walsh, Simon C Ling, Nitin Khanna, Mary Anne Cooper, Samir C Grover, Gary May, Thomas D Walters, Linda Rabeneck, Richard Reznick, and Heather Carnahan.
    • Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; The Wilson Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
    • Gastrointest. Endosc. 2014 May 1;79(5):798-807.e5.

    BackgroundEnsuring competence remains a seminal objective of endoscopy training programs, professional organizations, and accreditation bodies; however, no widely accepted measure of endoscopic competence currently exists.ObjectiveBy using Delphi methodology, we aimed to develop and establish the content validity of the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool for colonoscopy.DesignAn international panel of endoscopy experts rated potential checklist and global rating items for their importance as indicators of the competence of trainees learning to perform colonoscopy. After each round, responses were analyzed and sent back to the experts for further ratings until consensus was reached.Main Outcome MeasurementsConsensus was defined a priori as ≥80% of experts, in a given round, scoring ≥4 of 5 on all remaining items.ResultsFifty-five experts agreed to be part of the Delphi panel: 43 gastroenterologists, 10 surgeons, and 2 endoscopy managers. Seventy-three checklist and 34 global rating items were generated through a systematic literature review and survey of committee members. An additional 2 checklist and 4 global rating items were added by Delphi panelists. Five rounds of surveys were completed before consensus was achieved, with response rates ranging from 67% to 100%. Seven global ratings and 19 checklist items reached consensus as good indicators of the competence of clinicians performing colonoscopy.LimitationsFurther validation required.ConclusionDelphi methodology allowed for the rigorous development and content validation of a new measure of endoscopic competence, reflective of practice across institutions. Although further evaluation is required, it is a promising step toward the objective assessment of competency for use in colonoscopy training, practice, and research.Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…