• Merete Gregersen, Else Marie Damsgaard, and Lars Carl Borris.
• Department of Geriatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, P.P. Oerumsgade 11, 8000, Århus C, Denmark, meregreg@rm.dk.
• Eur J Orthop Surg Tr. 2015 Aug 1; 25 (6): 1031-8.

ObjectivesIt is still under debate that red blood cell (RBC) transfusions might increase the risk of healthcare-associated infections after hip fracture surgery. Previously, we found that a liberal RBC transfusion strategy improved survival in nursing home residents. Our aim, therefore, was to investigate whether a more liberal RBC transfusion strategy was associated with a higher infection risk in frail elderly hip fracture patients.DesignProspective, assessor-blinded, randomized and controlled trial.SettingsOrthopedic ward, Geriatric ward, and Hospital-at-home.Patients284 consecutively hospital-admitted elderly with hip fracture from nursing homes or sheltered housing facilities were included.InterventionA restrictive RBC transfusion strategy (hemoglobin <9.7 g/dL; 6 mmol/L) compared with a liberal strategy (hemoglobin <11.3 g/dL; 7 mmol/L) administered within 30 days after surgery.Main Outcome MeasurementsLeukocytes and C-reactive protein (CRP) in repeated blood samples within 30 days, and number of all infections (pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and other infections) within 10 days.Results88 % of the patients received a RBC transfusion. A median of 1 RBC unit (interquartile range (IQR): 1-2) was transfused for the restrictive strategy group versus 3 RBC units (IQR: 2-5) for the liberal group. Leukocytes and CRP measurements were similar for both groups. Rates of infection were 72 % for the restrictive group compared to 66 % for the liberal group (risk ratio 1.08; 95 % confidence interval 0.93-1.27, p value 0.29).ConclusionsA more liberal RBC transfusion strategy was not associated with higher risk of infection among residents from nursing homes or sheltered housing undergoing hip fracture surgery.

41 keywords...

hide…