• Peter K Aalund, Kristian Larsen, Torben B Hansen, and Thomas Bandholm.
• Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Holstebro Regional Hospital, Holstebro, Denmark.
• Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Feb 1;94(2):384-90.

ObjectiveTo investigate which of the 2 muscle-impairment measures for the operated leg, normalized knee extension strength or leg press power, was most closely associated with performance-based and self-reported measures of function shortly after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).DesignCross-sectional, exploratory study.SettingLaboratory at a regional hospital.ParticipantsIndividuals (N=39) with an average age ± SD of 65.5±10.3 years, who all had unilateral TKA 28 days prior.InterventionsNone.Main Outcome MeasuresThe patients performed maximal isometric knee extensions and dynamic leg presses to determine their body-mass normalized knee extension strength and leg press power, respectively. The 10-meter fast speed walking- and 30-second chair stand tests were used to determine performance-based function, while the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Oxford Knee Scores were used to determine self-reported function.ResultsNormalized leg press power was more closely associated with both performance-based (r=.82, P<.001) and self-reported (r=.48, P=.002) measures of function compared with normalized knee extension strength (r=.51, P=.001 and r=.39, P=.015, respectively).ConclusionsNormalized leg press power was more closely associated with both performance-based and self-reported function early after TKA than normalized knee extension strength. It may be explained by the fact that performance-based measures of function are typically closed kinetic chain tasks, such as walking or rising from a chair, and self-reported measures of function typically include questions that address perceived difficulty with performing these same tasks.Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

20 keywords...

hide…