• Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2000

    Review

    Early versus late discontinuation of oxygen in preterm or low birth weight infants.

    • L M Askie and D J Henderson-Smart.
    • NSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, Building DO2, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2006. laskie@mail.usyd.edu.au
    • Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2000 Jan 1; 2001 (2): CD001076CD001076.

    BackgroundThis section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue.ObjectivesIn preterm or low birth weight infants, does early versus late weaning from supplementary oxygen influence mortality, retinopathy of prematurity, lung function, growth or development?Search StrategyThe standard search strategy of the Neonatal Review Group was used. This included searches of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, MEDLINE, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants, journal handsearching mainly in the English language. An additional literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases was conducted in order to locate any trials in addition to those provided by the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL/CCTR).Selection CriteriaAll trials utilising random or quasi-random patient allocation, in which early weaning was compared with late discontinuation of supplemental oxygen in preterm or low birth weight infants, were eligible for inclusion.Data Collection And AnalysisThe methodological quality of the one eligible trial was assessed independently by each author for the degree of selection, performance, attrition and detection bias. Data regarding clinical outcomes including mortality, retinopathy of prematurity, and long term growth and development were extracted and reviewed independently by each author. Results were compared and differences resolved as required. Data analysis was conducted according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.Main ResultsIn the single eligible trial of 99 infants with birthweights less than 1650g, there were no significant differences in neonatal death rates or retrolental fibroplasia (any grade or severe) for all infants, or among infants with birth weights of less than 1000g. No other outcome measures specified a priori as clinically meaningful were reported in enough detail or with satisfactory follow-up rates to include in the analysis (early death; chronic lung disease; and long term growth, development, lung or visual function).Reviewer's ConclusionsThe results of this systematic review do not provide strong evidence for either the benefits or harms of early oxygen weaning in preterm/LBW infants. Future research should be directed toward addressing the question of what are the most appropriate target levels of oxygenation, in both the early and late neonatal periods, rather than whether oxygen should be weaned early or late.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…