-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Propofol cardioprotection for on-pump aortocoronary bypass surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (PRO-TECT II): a phase 2 randomized-controlled trial.
- David M Ansley, Koen Raedschelders, Peter T Choi, Baohua Wang, Richard C Cook, and David D Y Chen.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. david.ansley@vch.ca.
- Can J Anaesth. 2016 Apr 1; 63 (4): 442-53.
PurposeThe efficacy of myocardial conditioning strategies is compromised in patients with advanced age, diabetes, or low ejection fraction. We conducted a single-centre parallel-arm blinded randomized-controlled trial to determine whether propofol provides perioperative myocardial protection.MethodsPatients enrolled in this study were scheduled for primary aortocoronary bypass surgery utilizing normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with blood cardioplegia. The participants were stratified by diabetic status and left ventricular ejection fraction and randomly assigned to receive either an elevated dose of propofol -previously associated with experimental cardioprotection- or an isoflurane preconditioning regime. The primary endpoint was the coronary sinus (CS) concentration of 15-F2t-isoprostane (isoP). Secondary endpoints included in-hospital low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) and major adverse cardiac events, 12- and 24-hr CS cardiac troponin I (cTnI) release, and myocardial B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) protein expression.ResultsData were analyzed from 125 of 137 randomized participants. Participants receiving propofol experienced a greater mean (SD) increase from baseline in CS 15-F2t-isoP levels compared with those receiving isoflurane [26.9 (10.9) pg·mL(-1) vs 12.1 (10.4) pg·mL(-1), respectively; mean difference, 14.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.0 to 18.6; P < 0.001] but a decreased incidence of LCOS (20.9% vs 57.1%, respectively; relative risk [RR],0.37; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.62; P < 0.001). The incidence of LCOS was similar between groups in participants without type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) (P = 0.382) but significantly decreased in the propofol DM2 subgroup compared with the isoflurane DM2 subgroup (17.9% vs 70.3%, respectively; RR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.52; P < 0.001). Propofol was associated with an increase in myocardial Bcl-2 protein expression (P = 0.005), a lower incidence of a CS cTnI threshold for myocardial infarction (P = 0.014), and fewer heart failure events (P < 0.001).ConclusionPropofol may be a preemptive intraoperative cardioprotectant for patients with DM2 under conditions of normothermic CPB and blood cardioplegic arrest. The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00734383) and www.controlled-trials.com (ISRCTN70879185).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.