• Spine J · Nov 2015

    Factors associated with long-term patient-reported outcomes after three-column osteotomies.

    • Kevin R O'Neill, Lawrence G Lenke, Keith H Bridwell, Brian J Neuman, Han Jo Kim, and Kristin R Archer.
    • Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute, Suite 4200, Medical Center East South Tower, 1215 21st Ave. S., Nashville, TN 37232-8774, USA. Electronic address: kevin.oneill@vanderbilt.edu.
    • Spine J. 2015 Nov 1;15(11):2312-8.

    Background ContextStudies have demonstrated sustained improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after three-column osteotomies (three-COs), but no study has evaluated what factors impact long-term outcomes.PurposeThe aim was to investigate factors associated with PROs in patients who underwent three-CO at minimum 5 years postoperatively.Study Design/SampleThis was a retrospective review of prospective database.Patient SampleAll patients who had a three-CO at a single institution and completed clinical evaluations after at least 5 years postoperative were included.Outcome MeasuresOswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) scores, and radiographic parameters were assessed at baseline and a minimum 5 years postoperatively.MethodsAnalysis of 120 patients who underwent three-CO (96-pedicle subtraction osteotomy/24-vertebral column resection) was performed. The mean age was 48 years (range 8-79), and clinical follow-up was 7 years (range 5-14). Separate multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with ODI, SRS average, and SRS satisfaction while controlling for time since surgery and baseline outcome scores.ResultsAverage PROs were significantly improved from baseline at a minimum 5-year follow-up (ODI: 48-28, p<.01; SRS: 2.8-3.5, p<.01). The average SRS satisfaction score was 4.0. Average sagittal alignment (C7 plumb) improved 74 mm, with 81% of patients' alignment less than 95 mm. Major surgical complications occurred in 32 patients (27%) with major reoperations in 30 patients (25%). Multivariable regression analysis found that prior surgery and major reoperations were risk factors for worse ODI scores. A diagnosis of adult idiopathic scoliosis and final sagittal alignment less than 95 mm were associated with improved SRS scores. Improvement in major coronal Cobb and final pelvic tilt less than 30° were associated with increased SRS satisfaction.ConclusionsWith a minimum 5-year follow-up, PROs in patients undergoing three-CO were associated with improvements in radiographic alignment but negatively affected by prior surgery and complications necessitating revision surgery.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.