-
- J Díaz Guzmán.
- Servicio de Neurologia, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. jdiaz@hdoc.es
- Neurologia. 2003 Dec 1;18 Suppl 2:3-10.
AbstractDiagnostic reasoning is a cognitive proccess that has various performance and results. There are several kinds of clinical reasoning, such as model or pattern recognizing, causal or physiopathologic reasoning, deterministic, exhaustive, and hypotetic-deductive ones. Each form of reasoning may be relevant in certain clinical context, and all of the forms are also complementary. The logical consequence of diagnostic reasoning, like every cognitive proccess, is a clinical error. It is necessary that the neurologist knows the principles of diagnostic reasoning and the more frequent errors and biases. These can be summarized as: errors associated with the proccess of taking history and clinical examination, mnesic and semantic components of clinical reasoning, failure of hipotetic- deductive reasoning, and inadequate use of probability theory in Medicine.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.