• Spine · May 2007

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    A comparison of two short education programs for improving low back pain-related disability in the elderly: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

    • Francisco Kovacs, Víctor Abraira, Severo Santos, Elena Díaz, Mario Gestoso, Alfonso Muriel, María Teresa Gil del Real, Nicole Mufraggi, Juan Noguera, Javier Zamora, and Spanish Back Pain Research Network.
    • Departamento Científico, Fundación Kovacs, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. kovacs@kovacs.org
    • Spine. 2007 May 1;32(10):1053-9.

    Study DesignCluster randomized clinical trial.ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness of 2 minimal education programs for improving low back pain (LBP)-related disability in the elderly.Summary Of Background DataNo education program has shown effectiveness on low back pain (LBP)-related disability in the elderly.MethodsA total of 129 nursing homes (6389 residents) in northern Spain were invited to participate in the study. The actual participants were 12 nursing homes randomly assigned to 3 groups and 661 subjects. An independent physician gave a 20-minute talk with slide projections summarizing the content of the Back Book (active management group), the Back Guide (postural hygiene group), and a pamphlet on cardiovascular health (controls). Disability was measured with the Roland-Morris questionnaire (RMQ). Blind assessments were performed before the intervention, and 30 and 180 days later. The effect of the intervention on disability was estimated by generalized mixed linear random effects models.ResultsMean age of participants ranged between 79.9 and 81.2 years. Disability improved in all groups, but at the 30-day assessment the postural education group showed an additional improvement of 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-1.9), RMQ points and at the 180-day assessment the active education group an additional improvement of 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.6-3.4). In the subset of subjects with LBP when entering the study, postural education had no advantages over controls, while an additional improvement of 3.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.5- 4.5) RMQ points at the 180-day assessment was observed in the active education group.ConclusionIn institutionalized elderly, the handing out of the Back Book supported by a 20-minute group talk improves disability 6 months later, and is even more effective in those subjects with LBP.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…