• Neurology · Jul 2014

    Spectrogram screening of adult EEGs is sensitive and efficient.

    • Lidia M V R Moura, Mouhsin M Shafi, Marcus Ng, Sandipan Pati, Sydney S Cash, Andrew J Cole, Daniel Brian Hoch, Eric S Rosenthal, and M Brandon Westover.
    • From the Department of Neurology (L.M.V.R.M., M.N., S.P., S.S.C., A.J.C., D.B.H., E.S.R., M.B.W.), Epilepsy Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; and Department of Neurology (M.M.S.), Division of Epilepsy, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
    • Neurology. 2014 Jul 1;83(1):56-64.

    ObjectiveQuantitatively evaluate whether screening with compressed spectral arrays (CSAs) is a practical and time-effective protocol for assisting expert review of continuous EEG (cEEG) studies in hospitalized adults.MethodsThree neurophysiologists reviewed the reported findings of the first 30 minutes of 118 cEEGs, then used CSA to guide subsequent review ("CSA-guided review" protocol). Reviewers viewed 120 seconds of raw EEG data surrounding suspicious CSA segments. The same neurophysiologists performed independent page-by-page visual interpretation ("conventional review") of all cEEGs. Independent conventional review by 2 additional, more experienced neurophysiologists served as a gold standard. We compared review times and detection rates for seizures and other pathologic patterns relative to conventional review.ResultsA total of 2,092 hours of cEEG data were reviewed. Average times to review 24 hours of cEEG data were 8 (±4) minutes for CSA-guided review vs 38 (±17) minutes for conventional review (p < 0.005). Studies containing seizures required longer review: 10 (±4) minutes for CSA-guided review vs 44 (±20) minutes for conventional review (p < 0.005). CSA-guided review was sensitive for seizures (87.3%), periodic epileptiform discharges (100%), rhythmic delta activity (97.1%), focal slowing (98.7%), generalized slowing (100%), and epileptiform discharges (88.5%).ConclusionsCSA-guided review reduces cEEG review time by 78% with minimal loss of sensitivity compared with conventional review.Classification Of EvidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that screening of cEEG with CSAs efficiently and accurately identifies seizures and other EEG abnormalities as compared with standard cEEG visual interpretation.© 2014 American Academy of Neurology.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.