• Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Aug 2012

    Comparative Study

    Does the shunt type determine mid-term outcome after Norwood operation?

    • Joachim Photiadis, Nicodème Sinzobahamvya, Christoph Haun, Martin Schneider, Peter Zartner, Ehrenfried Schindler, Boulos Asfour, and Viktor Hraska.
    • Department of Paediatric Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, German Paediatric Heart Centre, Deutsches Kinderherzzentrum, Asklepios Clinic, Sankt Augustin, Germany. photiadis@gmx.de
    • Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Aug 1;42(2):209-15; discussion 215-6.

    ObjectivesWith improved short-term outcomes the right ventricular to pulmonary artery shunt (Sano) has become the preferred pulmonary blood source in the Norwood procedure in many centres. However, most studies analysed consecutive cohorts, with a first modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (BT) followed by the Sano cohort. Besides, neither comprehensive preoperative risk analysis nor outcome beyond 1 year of age was investigated.MethodsThis study reviews 109 neonates undergoing the Norwood procedure in the same interval between October 2002 and December 2009. The Sano (38) or BT shunt (71) was assigned according to the surgeon's preference. Two neonates subsequently underwent successful biventricular repair and were excluded. The Aristotle comprehensive score (ACS) was used to evaluate preoperative risk, with high-risk patients (n = 39) classified as having an ACS ≥ 20, and low-risk patients (n = 68) given an ACS <20.ResultsMean Aristotle score at the Norwood operation was 18.8 ± 0.4 and 18.9 ± 0.3 (P = 0.9) in Sano and BT, respectively. Mean follow-up interval was 4.1 ± 2.1 years (range: 1.7-8.9 years). Actuarial survival was similar, stabilizing from the 8th postoperative month onwards at 78.6 ± 4.9% (95% CI: 67.0-86.5%) for Sano and 78.4 ± 6.8% (95% CI: 61.4-88.6%) for BT; P = 0.95. Midterm actuarial survival was higher in low-risk patients, 88.2 ± 3.9% (95% CI: 77.8-93.9%) than in high-risk patients: 61.5 ± 7.8% (95% CI: 44.5-74.7%, P = 0.0003). No survival benefit was detected in low- or high-risk cases for either shunt type. Risk factors for midterm mortality were cardiorespiratory failure requiring ventilation (13/34, P = 0.004), and ACS ≥ 20 (15/39, P = 0.001), but not shunt type (8/37, P = 0.95). Increased number of shunt-related interventions before the Glenn procedure were noted with Sano (32.4 versus 6.5%, P = 0.002).ConclusionsPreoperative risk factors, regardless of shunt type, influence midterm survival after the Norwood procedure with an excellent outcome in low-risk patients, while high-risk cases still incur a significant mortality. Sano shunt interventions occurred with increased numbers. Although, Sano shunt may be the only feasible option in some instances, given the possible negative effects of ventriculotomy on right ventricle function, the widespread use of Sano shunt should be reconsidered.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.