• R J Purvis, E Law, J M Still, K Belcher, N Kito, and J B Dorman.
• Columbia Augusta Medical Center, Augusta, Ga., USA.
• J Burn Care Rehabil. 1998 Nov 1;19(6):538-41.

AbstractA study was carried out to evaluate burn nurses' attitudes toward do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. Questionnaires were submitted to 57 staff members, 52 of whom responded. Seventy-five percent of those responding ranged in age from 30 to 49 years. Seventy-one percent were registered nurses or licensed practical nurses. Sixty-five percent of the respondents had been in health care for more than 10 years; 25% had been in burn care for more than 10 years. Fifty percent were Protestants. Thirty-seven percent of the total described themselves as very religious. Ninety-four percent of respondents felt that DNR orders are sometimes appropriate. Eighty-eight percent felt that DNR decisions should not be made solely by the physician. Ninety-five percent felt that input from patients, family members, or both is essential. Having formal ethics committees make such decisions was opposed by 75% of the respondents. Fifty-six percent felt nurses should be involved in such decisions and 21% opposed such involvement. There was considerable uncertainty, disagreement, or both about whether a DNR order should include stopping all medical treatment, ventilators, intravenous fluids, gastric feedings, and medication. The study indicated statistically significant support for the view that DNR orders are appropriate in some cases. Which patients should be given DNR status and who should make the decision about writing DNR orders were more controversial questions.

25 keywords...

hide…