• Expert Opin Pharmacother · May 2010

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Escitalopram 20 mg versus duloxetine 60 mg for the treatment of chronic low back pain.

    • Marianna Mazza, Osvaldo Mazza, Costanza Pazzaglia, Luca Padua, and Salvatore Mazza.
    • Catholic University of Sacred Heart of Rome, Institute of Psychiatry and Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Via Ugo De Carolis, 48, 00136 Rome, Italy. marianna.mazza@rm.unicatt.it
    • Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 May 1;11(7):1049-52.

    BackgroundEscitalopram has never been demonstrated to be useful in the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP), while duloxetine has demonstrated analgesic effect in chronic pain states. The aim of this trial was to examine the efficacy of escitalopram for the treatment of CLBP compared with duloxetine.MethodsA total of 85 adult patients with non-radicular CLBP entered a 13-week randomized study comparing escitalopram 20 mg with duloxetine 60 mg once daily. The primary measure was comparison of the two drugs on reduction in weekly mean 24-h average pain. Secondary measures included Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S) and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).ResultsEighty patients (n = 39 escitalopram, n = 41 duloxetine) completed the study. No significant differences existed between escitalopram and duloxetine on reduction in weekly mean 24-h average pain at end point. Both escitalopram and duloxetine demonstrated significant improvement on CGI-S and SF-36.ConclusionsEscitalopram and duloxetine demonstrated efficacy and safety in the management of CLBP, with no significant differences. Results of this study should be replicated in a larger sample of patients.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.