• T S van der Werf, J G Zijlstra, J J M Ligtenberg, and J E Tulleken.
• Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, afd Interne Geneeskunde, 9700 RB Groningen. t.s.van.der.werf@int.umcg.nl
• Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Apr 2;149(14):742-6.

AbstractThe decision to move from curative treatment to palliative care in the intensive-care situation is less related to morals and ethics than it is to the assessment of medical issues, professionalism, communication and orchestration. Treatment should be considered medically pointless if, in the view of the treating physicians, it does not offer realistic chance to return to a meaningful life. Continuing futile care can be seen as disrespectful, both to the patient, his partner and the family, as well as to the members of the ICU team. Intensivists are responsible for withholding or withdrawing life support to patients in whom further life support is considered futile and who are unable to express their wishes due to critical illness and sedation. The intensivist typically makes this type of decision after a period in which medical and other information has been collected and after intensive discussions with other medical professionals as well as the partner and family. This is based on the trust that is built up through their skill, attitude and behaviour and that is perpetuated in a continuing process of intensive communication. Conflicts should be prevented, or at least recognised early and discussed. Ifa conflict is ongoing then it should be tackled by planning a number of consecutive consultations.

15 keywords...

hide…