• Joanna Picot, Jeremy Jones, Jill L Colquitt, Emma Loveman, and Andrew J Clegg.
• Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre (SHTAC), University of Southampton, Epsilon House, Enterprise Road, Southampton Science Park, Southampton, UK, SO16 7NS. j.picot@soton.ac.uk
• Obes Surg. 2012 Sep 1;22(9):1496-506.

BackgroundA systematic review and economic evaluation was commissioned to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for mild [class I, body mass index (BMI) 30 to 34.99] or moderate (class II, BMI 35 to 39.99) obesity.MethodsWe searched 17 electronic resources (to February 2010) and other sources. Studies meeting predefined criteria were identified, data-extracted and assessed for risk of bias using standard methodology. A model was developed to estimate cost-effectiveness.ResultsTwo RCTs were included. Evidence from both indicated a statistically significant benefit from laparoscopic adjustable banding (LAGB) compared to a non-surgical comparator for weight loss and in obesity-related comorbidity. Both interventions were associated with adverse events. LAGB costs more than non-surgical management. For people with class I or II obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D), the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at 2 years is £20,159, reducing to £4,969 at 5 years and £1,634 at 20 years. Resolution of T2D makes the greatest contribution to this reduction. In people with class I obesity, the ICER is £63,156 at 2 years, £17,158 at 5 years, and £13,701 at 20 years. Cost-effectiveness results are particularly sensitive to utility gain from reduction in BMI, factors associated with poorer surgical performance and diabetes health state costs.ConclusionsBariatric surgery appears to be a clinically effective and cost-effective intervention for people with class I or II obesity who also have T2D but is less likely to be cost-effective for people with class I obesity.

24 keywords...

hide…