• Int. J. Clin. Oncol. · Jun 2010

    Quality of guideline development assessed by the Evaluation Committee of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

    • Takuro Shimbo, Tsuguya Fukui, Chikashi Ishioka, Kohji Okamoto, Takahiro Okamoto, Shingo Kameoka, Atsushi Sato, Masakazu Toi, Kunihiko Matsui, Toshihiko Mayumi, Shigetoyo Saji, Masaru Miyazaki, Yuichi Takatsuka, and Koichi Hirata.
    • Department of Clinical Research and Informatics, Research Institute, International Medical Center of Japan, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan. tshimbo@ri.imcj.go.jp
    • Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010 Jun 1;15(3):227-33.

    BackgroundThe Japan Society of Clinical Oncology started implementing clinical practice guidelines for cancer in 2001. It created a Guideline Committee and has published cancer-related information in collaboration with individual subspecialty cancer societies. The society then established an Evaluation Committee to assess the quality of guidelines.MethodsThe quality of development and general characteristics of guidelines were reviewed using the AGREE instrument. The six standardized domain scores and 23-item crude scores were described, and items with a low median score or a wide inter-quartile range were explored. Kappa statistics for inter-rater reproducibility were also described.ResultsDomains in which the median score was >50 points in 18 guidelines developed between March 2005 and May 2009 included "scope and purpose," "rigor of development," and "clarity and presentation." Domains with a median score < 50 points were "stakeholder involvement," "applicability," and "editorial independence." Scores in all domains except "stakeholder involvement" were higher during the second half of the period than during the first half of the period, although P values were 0.10-0.93. Crude scores remained low for items 5, 7, 19, 20, 22, and 23, and the inter-quartile ranges of items 2, 6, 10, and 22 were wide. Kappa statistics ranged from -0.02 to 0.64, and they were especially low for items 3, 5, 7, 18, and 23.ConclusionGuideline quality has tended to improve during the 10 years since the society started this activity. However, issues remain to be improved through continuous revisions.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…