• A E Cameron, J Sievert, A J Asbury, and R Jackson.
• Vale of Leven District General Hospital, Alexandria, Dumbartonshire.
• Anaesthesia. 1996 Dec 1;51(12):1117-9.

AbstractThe ability of the laryngeal mask airway, tracheal tube and facemask to provide a leak free seal in a clinical setting was assessed by measuring the minimal fresh gas flows needed in a closed circle system during spontaneous ventilation on 60 subjects. The fresh gas flow was reduced until no spillage occurred from the pop-off valve. This fresh gas flow was taken to represent the sum of gas uptake by the subject and gas leakage from the circuit. The median fresh gas flow after 20 minutes was 350 ml.min-1 in the laryngeal mask airway group, 350 ml.min-1 in the tracheal tube group and 450 ml.min-1 in the facemask group. The fresh gas flow required for the facemask group was significantly higher than that for the laryngeal mask airway or tracheal tube groups (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the fresh gas flows required for the tracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway group. We conclude that the laryngeal mask airway provides as good a gas tight seal as a tracheal tube in this context and would be of benefit in reducing anaesthetic gas pollution.

16 keywords...

hide…