-
Comparative Study
Comparative study of electrophrenic nerve stimulation and mechanical ventilatory support in traumatic spinal cord injury.
- R E Carter, W H Donovan, L Halstead, and M A Wilkerson.
- Paraplegia. 1987 Apr 1;25(2):86-91.
AbstractOver the past two decades, the number of surviving apneic spinal cord injured patients has been increasing. Mechanical ventilation for home maintenance has been supplemented by electrophrenic respiration (EPR) since 1970. Nineteen patients who were totally mechanical ventilator dependent at discharge from rehabilitation in a spinal cord centre are compared with 18 patients discharged on EPR. There were more young males in the EPR group while the overall average ages were approximately the same. The mortality rates were approximately equal although the mechanical ventilator dependent patients expired earlier than the EPR group. Survivors on mechanical ventilation lived longer on an average and the vast majority of both groups were discharged to their home. There needs to be the establishment of a ventilatory dependent registry for spinal cord injury.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..