• U Kyriacos, J Jelsma, and S Jordan.
• Division of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. una.kyriacos@uct.ac.za
• J Nurs Manag. 2011 Apr 1;19(3):311-30.

AimTo evaluate the need for, and the development and utility of, pen-and-paper (Modified) Early Warning Scoring (MEWS/EWS) systems for adult inpatients outside critical care and emergency departments, by reviewing published literature.BackgroundSerious adverse events can be prevented by recognizing and responding to early signs of clinical and physiological deterioration.EvaluationOf 534 papers reporting MEWS/EWS systems for adult inpatients identified, 14 contained useable data on development and utility of MEWS/EWS systems. Systems without aggregate weighted scores were excluded.Key IssuesMEWS/EWS systems facilitate recognition of abnormal physiological parameters in deteriorating patients, but have limitations. There is no single validated scoring tool across diagnoses. Evidence of prospective validation of MEWS/EWS systems is limited; neither is implementation based on clinical trials. There is no evidence that implementation of Westernized MEWS/EWS systems is appropriate in resource-poor locations.ConclusionsBetter monitoring implies better care, but there is a paucity of data on the validation, implementation, evaluation and clinical testing of vital signs' monitoring systems in general wards.Implications For Nursing ManagementRecording vital signs is not enough. Patient safety continues to depend on nurses' clinical judgment of deterioration. Resources are needed to validate and evaluate MEWS/EWS systems in context.© 2011 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

15 keywords...

hide…