• Annals of surgery · Dec 2016

    How Informed Is the Decision About Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy?: A Prospective, Cross-sectional Study.

    • Clara Nan-Hi Lee, Peter Anthony Ubel, Allison M Deal, Lillian Burdick Blizard, Karen R Sepucha, David W Ollila, and Michael Patrick Pignone.
    • *Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC†Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC‡Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC§Department of Marketing, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC¶Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Biostatistics Core Facility, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC||Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA**Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA††Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA‡‡Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
    • Ann. Surg. 2016 Dec 1; 264 (6): 1103-1109.

    ObjectiveTo assess how informed patients are about breast reconstruction, and how involved they are in decision making.Summary Background DataBreast reconstruction is an important treatment option for patients undergoing mastectomy. Wide variations in who gets reconstruction, however, have led to concerns about decision making.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of patients planning mastectomy at a single site, over 20 months. Before surgery, patients completed a survey with validated scales to assess knowledge about breast reconstruction and involvement in decision making. Factors associated with knowledge were examined in a multivariable linear regression model.ResultsA total of 145 patients enrolled (77% enrollment rate), and 126 remained eligible. The overall knowledge score was 58.5% (out of 100%). Knowledge about risk of complications was especially low at 14.3%. Knowledge did not differ by treatment (reconstruction or not). On multivariable analysis, non-white race was independently associated with lower knowledge. Most patients (92.1%) reported some discussion with a provider about reconstruction, and most (90.4%) reported being asked their preference. More patients reported discussing the advantages of reconstruction (57.9%) than the disadvantages (27.8%).ConclusionsWomen undergoing mastectomy in this sample were highly involved in decision making, but had major deficits in knowledge about the procedure. Knowledge about the risk of complications was particularly low. Providers seemed to have discussed the advantages of reconstruction more than its disadvantages.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…