• Intensive care medicine · Sep 1999

    Comparative Study

    Improved prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome 15 years on.

    • F Jardin, J L Fellahi, A Beauchet, A Vieillard-Baron, Y Loubières, and B Page.
    • Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 9 avenue Charles de Gaulle, F-92 104 Boulogne Cedex, France.
    • Intensive Care Med. 1999 Sep 1;25(9):936-41.

    ObjectiveEvaluation of the impact of low-volume, pressure-limited ventilation on the recovery rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).DesignProspective observational clinical study with historical control.SettingUniversity hospital intensive care unit (ICU).PatientsWe studied two groups of, respectively, 33 and 37 ARDS patients separated by 15 years ("historical", June 1978-April 1981, and "recent", October 1993-June 1996).MethodARDS was defined as the presence of bilateral chest infiltrates and a PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio of less than 200 mmHg under controlled ventilation regardless of PEEP level. Any cardiac participation was excluded by right heart catheterization in the "historical" group and by echo-Doppler examination in the "recent" group. The origin of ARDS was principally pulmonary (ARDS(p)) in both groups (26/33 and 29/37, respectively), and secondarily extrapulmonary (ARDS(exp)) (7/33 and 8/37, respectively). In the "historical" group, normocapnia was the major goal for respiratory support and was achieved in all patients regardless of airway pressure levels. In contrast, end-inspiratory plateau pressure in the "recent" group was limited to 30 cmH(2)O under respiratory support, regardless of PaCO(2) level. The "historical" and "recent" ARDS groups were compared with regard to therapeutic procedure and outcome.ResultsNormalization of PaCO(2) (36 +/- 6 mmHg) in the "historical" group required high airway pressure (end-inspiratory plateau pressure at 39 +/- 4 cmH(2)O) and high tidal volume (13 ml/kg). Respiratory support used in the "recent" group was less aggressive, with lower airway pressure (end-inspiratory plateau pressure 25 +/- 4 cmH(2)O) and tidal volume (9 ml/kg) resulting in "permissive" hypercapnia (51 +/- 10 mmHg). Mortality rates significantly decreased from 64 % in the "historical" group to 32 % in the "recent" group (p < 0.01). This decrease concerned only ARDS(p), which was markedly predominant in both groups.ConclusionMortality due to ARDS of pulmonary origin has declined in our unit over the last 15 years. Low-volume, pressure-limited (protective) ventilation seems the most likely reason for improved survival, despite hypercapnia.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…