• M J L Sullivan, M O Martel, D A Tripp, A Savard, and G Crombez.
• Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Canada. michael.jl.sullivan@umontreal.ca
• Pain. 2006 Jul 1; 123 (1-2): 37-44.

AbstractPast research has shown that pain catastrophizing contributes to heightened pain experience. The hypothesis advanced in this study was that individuals who score high on measures of pain catastrophizing would also perceive more intense pain in others. The study also examined the role of pain behaviour as a determinant of the relation between catastrophizing and estimates of others' pain. To test the hypothesis, 60 undergraduates were asked to view videotapes of individuals taking part in a cold pressor procedure. Each individual in the videotapes was shown three times over the course of a 1min immersion such that the same individual was observed experiencing different levels of pain. Correlational analyses revealed a significant positive correlation between levels of pain catastrophizing and inferred pain intensity, r=.31, p<.01. Follow-up analyses indicated that catastrophizing was associated with a heightened propensity to rely on pain behaviour as a basis for drawing inferences about others' pain experience. Catastrophizing was associated with more accurate pain inferences on only one of three indices of inferential accuracy. The pattern of findings suggests that increasing reliance on pain behaviour as a means of inferring others' pain will not necessarily yield more accurate estimates. Discussion addresses the processes that might underlie the propensity to attend more to others' pain behaviour, and the clinical and interpersonal consequences of perceiving more pain in others.

19 keywords...

hide…