• Spine J · Nov 2012

    Multicenter Study

    Predicting the evolution of low back pain patients in routine clinical practice: results from a registry within the Spanish National Health Service.

    • Francisco M Kovacs, Jesús Seco, Ana Royuela, Josep Corcoll Reixach, Víctor Abraira, and Spanish Back Pain Research Network.
    • Departamento Científico, Fundación Kovacs, Paseo de Mallorca 36, 07012 Palma de Mallorca, Spain. kovacs@kovacs.org
    • Spine J. 2012 Nov 1;12(11):1008-20.

    Background ContextThe Spanish National Health Service (SNHS) is a tax-funded public organization that provides free health care to every resident in Spain.PurposeTo develop models for predicting the evolution of low back pain (LBP) in routine clinical practice within SNHS.Study DesignAnalysis of a prospective registry in routine clinical practice, in 17 centers across SNHS.Patient SamplePatient sample includes 4,477 acute and chronic LBP patients treated in primary and hospital care.Outcome MeasuresPain and disability, measured through validated instruments.MethodsPatients treated for LBP were assessed at baseline and 3 months later. Data gathered were the following: sex, age, employment status, duration of pain, severity of LBP, pain down to the leg (LP) and disability, history of lumbar surgery, diagnostic procedures undertaken, imaging findings, and treatments used throughout the study period. Three separate multivariate logistic regression models were developed for predicting a clinically relevant improvement in LBP, LP, and disability at 3 months.ResultsIn total, 4,261 patients (95.2%) attended follow-up. For all the models, calibration was reasonable and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was ≥0.640. For LBP, LP, and disability, factors associated with a higher probability of improvement at 3 months were the following: not having undergone lumbar surgery, higher baseline scores for the corresponding variable, lower ones for the rest, and being treated with neuroreflexotherapy. Additional factors were the following: for LBP, shorter pain duration; for LP, not undergoing electromyography; and for disability, shorter pain duration, not being diagnosed with disc degeneration, and being treated with muscle relaxants and not opioids.ConclusionsA prospective registry can be used for developing predictive models to quantify the odds that a given LBP patient will experience a clinically relevant improvement. This may empower patients for an informed shared decision making.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…