-
- P D McNeely, P C Hébert, R E Dales, A M O'Connor, G Wells, D McKim, and K E Sullivan.
- Department of Medicine, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ont.
- CMAJ. 1997 Jan 15;156(2):177-83.
ObjectiveTo determine when respirologists approach patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to decide about the use of mechanical ventilation, what information they provide to patients and how they provide it.DesignSelf-administered national survey.ParticipantsAll Canadian specialists in respiratory medicine; of 401 eligible respirologists, 279 (69.6%) returned a completed questionnaire.Outcome MeasuresTiming and content of doctor-patient discussions regarding mechanical ventilation; physicians' perception of their level of involvement in the decision-making process; and patient and physician characteristics that may influence decisions.ResultsDiscussions were reported to occur most often at advanced stages of COPD: when the patient's dyspnea was severe (reported by 235 [84.2%] of the respondents) or when the patient's forced expiratory volume in the first second was 30% or less than predicted value (reported by 210 [75.3%]). A total of 120 respondents (43.0%) stated that they discuss mechanical ventilation with 40% or less of their COPD patients before an exacerbation necessitates ventilatory support. Most (154 [55.2%]) described the decision-making process as a collaboration between patient and physician; 83 (29.7%) reported that the patient decides after he or she has considered the physician's opinion. Over half (148 [53.0%]) of the respondents indicated that they occasionally, often or always modify the information provided to patients in order to influence their decision about mechanical ventilation.ConclusionsDiscussions with COPD patients concerning end-of-life decisions about mechanical ventilation are reported to occur in advanced stages of the disease or not at all, with patients' input where possible. Information presented to patients is often modified in order to influence the decision. Future studies should explore ways to involve patients further in the decision-making process and to improve the process for both patients and physicians.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.