• Spine · Nov 2008

    Comparative Study

    Computed tomography and biomechanical evaluation of screw fixation options at the cervicothoracic junction: intralamina versus intrapedicular techniques.

    • Mario J Cardoso, Anton E Dmitriev, Ronald A Lehman, Melvin Helgeson, Patrick Cooper, and Michael K Rosner.
    • Department of Surgery, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307, USA. mtcardoso@comcast.net
    • Spine. 2008 Nov 15;33(24):2612-7.

    Study DesignIn vitro cadaveric biomechanical analysis.ObjectiveDefine the T1 and T2 anatomic lamina size and evaluate the bone-screw interface strength of various pedicle screw options and intralamina techniques.Summary Of Background DataTranspedicular instrumentation is well accepted, but salvage techniques in the proximal thoracic spine are limited. Intralamina fixation has been described at C2 with favorable biomechanical characteristics. In addition, this technique has been introduced clinically in the proximal thoracic spine. However, the biomechanical potential has not been evaluated.MethodsFourteen fresh-frozen cervicothoracic cadaveric specimens were scanned using dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry for bone mineral density, imaged under computed tomography, and then instrumented in the following configuration: (1) Right-sided pedicle screws in a straight-forward trajectory, (2) "salvage anatomic trajectory pedicle screws, and (3) "salvage" intralamina screws into the contralateral lamina. Insertional torque (IT) was recorded with each revolution and screws were pulled out in-line (POS) with the screw axis to simulate intraoperative failure of fixation.ResultsLamina screws as a salvage technique generated statistically greater peak IT (P = 0.002) and relative POS (P < 0.05) in comparison with straight-forward transpedicular screws as the initial fixation type. Furthermore, lamina screws, when compared to the salvage anatomic trajectory pedicle screws, had a significantly greater peak IT (P = 0.011). The peak IT showed a stronger correlation with POS in lamina screws than straight-forward or anatomic pedicle screws with a similar trend noted in mean IT. Bone mineral density correlated with POS in all methods of fixation. The mean lamina width measured on computed tomography at the thinnest point was 5.9 +/- 0.7 mm (range, 4.9-7.9).ConclusionOur results suggest that lamina screws, used as a salvage technique in the proximal thoracic spine, provide stronger fixation than transpedicular screws when using standard 4.5-mm cervical screws. In-tralamina screws appear to be a biomechanically sound salvage technique in the region, and appear to be a safe, effective technique for instrumenting the proximal thoracic spine.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…