• J Obstet Gynaecol · Aug 2007

    Pain perception among parturients in Enugu, South-eastern Nigeria.

    • H E Onah, S N Obi, T C Oguanuo, H A Ezike, C M Ogbuokiri, and J O Ezugworie.
    • Department of Obstetrics, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria. hyacinon@yahoo.com
    • J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Aug 1;27(6):585-8.

    AbstractIn order to evaluate pain perception among parturients in Enugu, South-east Nigeria, a cross-sectional questionnaire study of parturients who delivered vaginally in four health institutions in Enugu from 2 December 2005 to 21 January 2006 was administered. Data analysis was by means of percentages, means +/- SD, correlation coefficients, t-tests, chi2-tests, one-way ANOVA and other inferential statistics using the statistical package SPSS for MS Windows at the 95% confidence level. A total of 250 questionnaires were distributed, out of which 181 were correctly filled and returned for a response rate of 72.4%. On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing maximal pain, the mean intensity of pain recorded by the respondents was 7.7 +/- 2.8. A total of 40 (22.1%) parturients received some pain relieving drug during their labour while 141 (77.9%) did not. Of the 40 women who received intra-partum analgesia, three women received pethidine, 17 (42.5%) received pentazocine, while 20 (50%) did not know the analgesic they received. Of the 141 respondents who did not receive intra-partum analgesia, 79 (56.0%) would have liked to have receive analgesia, while 62 (44.0%) would not. Of the 92 women who had their backs rubbed by companions during labour, 67 (72.8%) reported that this practice was helpful in relieving their labour pains, while 25 (27.2%) did not find it helpful. Of the 141 women who had a companion, 103 (73.0%) reported that this was helpful in relieving labour pains, while 38 (27.0%) reported no benefit. Antenatal care, place of residence, ethnicity, religion, marital status, occupational level, receiving intra-partum analgesia, type of analgesia received, having a companion during labour or receiving lectures on labour pains during the antenatal period had no significant impact on pain perception by the respondents (p > 0.05 for each of these variables). There was no significant correlation between pain scores and the respondents' ages and gestational age at delivery (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant positive correlation between the parturients' pain scores and their educational levels (r = 0.18, p = 0.018) and a significant negative correlation between pain scores and parity (r = -0.23, p = 0.009), with primigravidae having the highest perceived mean pain score compared with multiparas and grandmultiparas (7.5 +/- 2.3 vs 6.6 +/- 2.5 vs 6.3 +/- 2.1, p = 0.048). Additionally, those parturients who had their backs rubbed by a companion had a significantly higher mean perceived pain score than their counterparts whose backs were not rubbed (8.4 +/- 2.4 vs 6.8 +/- 2.9, p = 0.000). Parturients whose labours were either induced or augmented had a significantly higher perceived mean pain score than those who had spontaneous labour (8.9 +/- 2.5 vs 7.1 +/- 2.8, p = 0.001). It was concluded that parturients in Enugu, Eastern Nigeria, perceive labour as a very painful process with only a minority of them receiving any form of intra-partum analgesia. There is thus a large unmet need for pain relief among the parturients. Obstetric analgesia as is currently practiced in developed countries is long overdue in Nigeria.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…