• Jan N Hilberath, Stanton K Shernan, Scott Segal, Brian Smith, and Holger K Eltzschig.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
• Anesth. Analg. 2009 Jan 1;108(1):17-22.

BackgroundMeasuring the aortic valve area (AVA) remains an important component of a comprehensive intraoperative echocardiographic examination in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. Epicardial echocardiography (EE) represents an accessible alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), however, its agreement and correlation with other imaging modalities for measuring AVA has not been systematically validated.MethodsEE was used in 85 patients undergoing cardiac surgery to measure AVA (AVA-EE) using the continuity equation. AVA-EE was compared to measurements obtained by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (AVA-TEE) in the same population. In a subset of patients, AVA-EE was also compared to AVA measurements from either preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (AVA-TTE) (n = 65) or cardiac catheterization (AVA-Cath) (n = 35) that were acquired within 4 wk before the date of surgery.ResultsAdequate trans-AV Doppler recordings were obtained in 94% of patients for AVA-TEE and 100% of patients for AVA-EE. EE measurements of AVA showed close agreement with TEE measurements (mean difference [bias] +/- 95% CI = -0.09 cm(2) +/- 0.18 cm(2), r(2) = 0.83, P < 0.0001). AVA-EE also agreed well with AVA-Cath (mean difference +/- 95% CI = -0.03 cm(2) +/- 0.12 cm(2), r(2) = 0.87, P < 0.0001) and AVA-TTE (mean difference +/- 95% CI = -0.06 cm(2) +/- 0.22 cm(2), r(2) = 0.81, P < 0.0001).ConclusionsEE measurements of AVA by the continuity equation show high agreement and closely correlate with established techniques of AVA assessment.

25 keywords...

hide…