-
- Richard Griffith.
- College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, UK.
- Br J Nurs. 2012 Nov 8;21(20):1234-5.
AbstractThere has been considerable criticism recently over the use of end-of-life pathways and do-not-resuscitate orders with vulnerable, incapable patients, often without discussion. This criticism has led to press and judicial scrutiny of the lawfulness of decisions to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatment. In this article, the author reviews the law and argues that flawed decision-making by doctors and nurses, rather than the actual end-of-life pathway or do-not-resuscitate order, is where the lawfulness of withdrawing and withholding treatment must be challenged.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..