• J Scott Delaney, Ammar Al-Kashmiri, Penny-Jane Baylis, Mahmood Aljufaili, and José A Correa.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. j.delaney@mcgill.ca
• Clin J Sport Med. 2012 Jul 1;22(4):341-8.

ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of a standard long-handle laryngoscope and a short-handle laryngoscope on ease of possible intubation in football, ice hockey, and soccer players.DesignProspective crossover study.SettingUniversity Sport Medicine Clinic.ParticipantsSixty-two university varsity football (62 males), 45 ice hockey (26 males and 19 females), and 39 soccer players (20 males, 19 females).InterventionsAthletes were assessed for different airway and physical characteristics. Three different physicians then assessed the use of laryngoscopes of different handle sizes in supine athletes who were wearing protective equipment while in-line cervical spine immobilization was maintained.Main Outcome MeasuresThe ease of passage of a laryngoscope blade into the posterior oropharynx of a supine athlete was assessed using both a standard long-handle and a short-handle laryngoscope.ResultsUse of a short-handle laryngoscope was easier for all physicians in all sports as compared with a standard-sized laryngoscope. Passage of a laryngoscope blade into the posterior oropharynx of a supine athlete was easiest in soccer players and most difficult in football and ice hockey players for both sizes of laryngoscope. Interference from chest or shoulder pads was a common cause for difficulty in passing the laryngoscope blade into the posterior oropharynx for football and ice hockey players.ConclusionsIn the rare instances that an endotracheal intubation is to be attempted on an unconscious athlete, a short-handle laryngoscope may provide the best chance for successful intubation.

19 keywords...

hide…