-
Comparative Study
Feasibility of shock advice analysis during CPR through removal of CPR artefacts from the human ECG.
- Joar Eilevstjønn, Trygve Eftestøl, Sven Ole Aase, Helge Myklebust, John Håkon Husøy, and Petter Andreas Steen.
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stavanger University College, P.O. Box 8002, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway. joar.eilevstjonn@tn.his.no
- Resuscitation. 2004 May 1;61(2):131-41.
AbstractMechanical activity from chest compressions and ventilations during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) introduces artefact components into the electrocardiogram (ECG). CPR must therefore be discontinued for reliable shock advice analysis in automated external defibrillators. Reducing or eliminating this detrimental "hands-off" time by removing the CPR artefacts, should significantly improve the defibrillation success rate. The feasibility of this was tested by removing the CPR artefacts using a multichannel adaptive filter, the multichannel recursive adaptive matching pursuit (MC-RAMP) algorithm. Human ECG and reference channel data from episodes with both shockable and non-shockable underlying heart rhythms were recorded from 105 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The performance of a shock advice algorithm was evaluated before and after artefact removal using the MC-RAMP algorithm. From a test set consisting of 92 shockable and 174 non-shockable episodes a sensitivity of 96.7% and specificity of 79.9% was achieved, an increase of approximately 15 and 13%, respectively, compared to no filtering. Good sensitivity was achieved, enabling ECG analysis during CPR that would reduce the hands-off time on patients with shockable rhythms. However, CPR artefact removal on non-shockable rhythms proved a more difficult problem. We need a better understanding of the physiological mixing of artefacts and the underlying heart rhythm and suggest clinical trials to investigate the nature of CPR artefacts further.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.