• J Trauma · May 2011

    Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Routine follow-up imaging of kidney injuries may not be justified.

    • Marko Bukur, Kenji Inaba, Galinos Barmparas, Christian Paquet, Charles Best, Lydia Lam, David Plurad, and Demetrios Demetriades.
    • Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Los Angeles County Medical Center+University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
    • J Trauma. 2011 May 1;70(5):1229-33.

    BackgroundThe purpose of this investigation was to determine the yield of repeat follow-up imaging in patients sustaining renal trauma.MethodsThe Los Angeles County+University of Southern California Medical Center trauma registry was reviewed to identify all patients with a diagnosis of kidney injury from 2005 to 2008. All final attending radiologist interpretations and the dates of the initial and follow-up computerized tomography (CT) scans were also reviewed. Grades I, II, and III were grouped as low-grade injuries and grades IV and V as high-grade injuries.ResultsDuring the 4-year study period, 120 (1.2% of all trauma admissions) patients had a total of 121 kidney injuries: 85.8% were male, and the mean age±SD was 31.1 years±14.5 years. Overall, 22.6% of blunt and 35.6% of penetrating kidney injuries were high grade (IV-V; p=0.148). These high-grade injuries were managed operatively in 35.7% and 76.2% of blunt and penetrating injuries, respectively, (p=0.022). Overall, 31.7% underwent at least one follow-up CT; 24.2% of patients with blunt and 39.7% of patients with penetrating kidney injury, respectively. None of the patients with a low-grade injury managed nonoperatively developed a complication, independent of the injury mechanism. High-grade blunt and penetrating kidney injuries managed nonoperatively were associated with 11.1% and 20.0% complication rate identified on follow-up CT, respectively. For patients who underwent surgical interventions for penetrating kidney injuries, the diagnosis of the complication was made at 9.8 days±7.0 days (range, 1-24 days), with 83.3% of them diagnosed within 8 days postoperatively. The most frequent complication identified was an abscess in the renal fossa (50.0% of all complications). Other complications included urinoma, ureteral stricture, and pseudoaneurysm. All patients who developed complications were symptomatic, prompting the imaging that led to the diagnosis. All patients who developed a complication after a penetrating injury required intervention for the management of the complication.ConclusionSelective reimaging of renal injuries based on clinical and laboratory criteria seems to be safe regardless of injury mechanism or management. High-grade penetrating injuries undergoing operative intervention should carry the highest degree of vigilance and lowest threshold for repeat imaging.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…