• Revista médica de Chile · May 2008

    Comparative Study

    [Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones].

    • Enrique Norero, Blanca Norero, Alvaro Huete, Fernando Pimentel, Francisco Cruz, Luis Ibáñez, Jorge Martínez, and Nicolás Jarufe.
    • Departamento de Cirugía Digestiva, División de Cirugía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile.
    • Rev Med Chil. 2008 May 1;136(5):600-5.

    BackgroundMagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography MRCP) is a non-invasive diagnostic method for choledocholithiasis.AimTo evaluate the results of MRCP in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.Patients And MethodsRetrospective review of MRCP reports performed between October 2001 and December 2004. We included patients with suspected choledocholithiasis who were studied with MRCP and some other confirmatory test such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ERCP), surgical common bile duct exploration or transcystic colangiography TC).ResultsOne hundred and twenty five patients aged 58+/-20 years 70 females) were included. In 54 patients 43%) we compared the results of MRCP with the findings of surgical common bile duct exploration or TC and in 71 57%) we did so with ERCP. MRCP suggested choledocholithiasis in 93 patients and in 32 it was negative. Eighty six 67%) patients had choledocholithiasis according to TC or ERCP, including 3 patients who had a negative MRCP. Therefore the sensibility was 97%, specificity 74% positive predictive value 89%, negative predictive value 90% and accuracy of MRCP was 90% for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.ConclusionsMRCP has a high accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…