• J Am Soc Echocardiogr · Dec 2006

    Asynchrony of left ventricular systolic performance after the first acute myocardial infarction in patients with narrow QRS complexes: Doppler tissue imaging study.

    • Mohamed Fahmy Elnoamany, Hala Mahfouz Badran, Tarek Helmy Abo Elazm, and Eslam Shawky Abdelaziz.
    • Menoufyia Faculty of Medicine, Menoufyia, Egypt.
    • J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006 Dec 1;19(12):1449-57.

    BackgroundLeft ventricular (LV) electromechanical delay results in asynchronized contraction. However, it is not known if the presence of cardiac diseases without QRS prolongation may result in interventricular or intraventricular asynchrony. Doppler tissue imaging is now established for detecting regional contractile abnormalities and asynchrony in the LV.ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to assess the degree of LV asynchrony after the first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with a narrow QRS complex using Doppler tissue imaging and correlate this with the site and extent of the infarction.MethodsEchocardiography with Doppler tissue imaging was performed within 1 week of AMI in 155 patients and compared with 50 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Regional myocardial velocities were assessed at the 4 mitral annular sites, and the corresponding systolic velocity (Sm), early diastolic velocity (Em), time to peak Sm (Ts), and time to peak Em (Te) were measured. To assess LV synchronicity, SDs of Ts (Ts-SD) and Te (Te-SD) of all the 4 mitral annular sites were computed. Location and size of infarct were confirmed by echocardiographic wall-motion score index.ResultsQRS complex duration was normal in all patients. Wall-motion score index was significantly higher in patients with anterior than inferior AMI (2.02 +/- 0.34 vs 1.24 +/- 0.21, P < .001). Ts-SD was significantly higher in patient than control group, and in patients with anterior than inferior AMI (38.21 +/- 2.59 vs 21.06 +/- 0.52 milliseconds and 43.18 +/- 3.77 vs 33.24 +/- 1.4 milliseconds, respectively, P < .001 for each), whereas Te-SD did not differ significantly among these groups (20.35 +/- 1.77 vs 18.17 +/- 1.14 milliseconds and 21.6 +/- 1.35 vs 19.1 +/- 1.11 milliseconds, respectively, P > .05 for each). A strong positive correlation was detected between LV systolic asynchrony (Ts-SD) and wall-motion score index (r = .77), LV mass (r = .67), LV end-systolic dimension (r = .65), and LV end-diastolic dimension (r = .5). The correlation was negative with LV ejection fraction (r = -.70) and Sm (r = -.6); the correlation was weak with Em (r = -.33) (P < .001 for all). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, infarct size was found to be the most independent predictor for systolic asynchrony (odds ratio 3.59, 95% confidence interval [1.43-9.33], P < .001).ConclusionAMI has a significant impact on regional myocardial contractility and LV systolic (but not diastolic) synchronicity early in the course even in the absence of QRS widening or bundle branch block. The degree of LV systolic asynchrony is greater with anterior than inferior AMI and mainly determined by infarct size.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.