• Els Inghelbrecht, Johan Bilsen, Freddy Mortier, and Luc Deliens.
• End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. Els.Inghelbrecht@vub.ac.be
• J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 May 1;41(5):870-9.

ContextContinuous deep sedation (CDS) is a subject of important debate, but until now nurses have rarely been questioned about their involvement and perceptions.ObjectivesTo study the communication process between nurses and patients, relatives, or physicians before starting CDS, and how nurses perceive this end-of-life practice.MethodsIn 2007, we surveyed 1678 nurses in Flanders, Belgium, who, in an earlier survey, had reported caring for one or more patients who received an end-of-life decision within the previous year. Nurses were surveyed about their most recent case.ResultsThe response rate was 75.8%: 250 nurses reported a case of CDS (64.4% hospital, 18.4% home, and 17.2% nursing home). In, respectively, 25.8% and 75.4%, the patient and relatives had communicated with the nurse about the CDS. In 17.6%, there was no communication between the nurse and the physician about the CDS; in 29.1%, the physician and nurse only exchanged information; and in 23.4%, they made the decision jointly. Making the decision jointly was associated with a more positive evaluation of the cooperation with the physician (adjusted odds ratio 10.9 and 95% confidence interval 3.0, 39.2). Nurses perceived CDS as partly intended to hasten death partially in 48.4% and explicitly in 28.4% of cases, estimating possible or certain life shortening in 95.6%.ConclusionNurses in different health care settings are often involved in communication about CDS. They see it mainly as a practice intended to hasten death, with a life-shortening effect; guidelines should recommend clear discussions between caregivers in which the physician states the purpose and estimated effect of the decision.Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…