• C Maria Kim, Janice J Eng, and Maura W Whittaker.
• Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
• Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Oct 1;85(10):1718-23.

ObjectivesTo compare the effect of functional electric stimulation (FES) with that of a hinged ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) for assisting foot clearance, gait speed, and endurance and to determine whether there is added benefit in using FES in conjunction with the hinged AFO in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI).DesignWithin-subject comparison of walking under 4 conditions: AFO, FES, AFO and FES, and no orthosis. A plastic hinged AFO was used for all AFO conditions.SettingTertiary rehabilitation center.ParticipantsNineteen subjects with incomplete SCI.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresThe self-selected gait speed, 6-minute walk distance, and foot clearance values were compared between conditions.ResultsGait speed increased with FES ( P <.05) and with the AFO ( P =.06). Six-minute walk distance also increased with the AFO ( P <.05). No difference was found between the 2 forms of orthoses in either gait speed or endurance. The greatest increase in gait speed and endurance from the no-orthosis condition occurred with the combined AFO and FES condition. Foot clearance improved with FES but not with AFO. Subjects whose gait speed increased with FES had weaker hip flexors, knee flexors, and ankle dorsiflexors than those who did not benefit from FES.ConclusionsBoth FES and the hinged AFO promote walking and FES is only superior to the AFO in increasing foot-clearance values. The hinged AFO and FES together may offer advantages over either device alone.

19 keywords...

hide…