• Christian Mueller, Barbara Frana, Daniel Rodriguez, Kirsten Laule-Kilian, and André P Perruchoud.
• University of Basel, University Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Basel, Switzerland. chmueller@uhbs.ch
• Can J Cardiol. 2005 Sep 1;21(11):921-4.

BackgroundThe most useful features in the diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF) have been poorly investigated.ObjectiveTo determine the utility of signs and symptoms in the diagnosis of CHF in the emergency department.MethodsDetailed clinical data were collected prospectively from 452 consecutive patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the emergency department. By using logistic regression analysis, significant predictors for the final discharge diagnosis of CHF (adjudicated after review of all patient records, including response to therapy) were assessed.ResultsIn 217 of 452 patients (48%), CHF was the cause of acute dyspnea. Among symptoms, the OR for CHF was highest for weight gain (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.9 to 7.0), nocturia (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.6 to 3.7) and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.6 to 3.5), and lowest for fever (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.56). Among signs, the OR was highest for elevated jugular venous pressure (OR 4.3; 95% CI 2.3 to 7.9), rales (OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.1 to 4.5), lower extremity edema (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.9 to 4.3) and hepatojugular reflux (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.4 to 5.2), and lowest for wheezing (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.61). The overall sensitivity was low. The specificity was highest for elevated jugular venous pressure and hepatojugular reflux.ConclusionsSigns and symptoms are only moderately helpful in the diagnosis of CHF in patients with acute dyspnea. This emphasizes the need for additional diagnostic tools, such as echocardiography or B-type natriuretic peptide testing.

26 keywords...

hide…