-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Dec 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPropofol-alfentanil versus fentanyl-midazolam in coronary artery surgery.
- E Collard, V Delire, A Mayné, J Jamart, Y Louagie, M Gonzalez, A Ducart, S Broka, P Randour, and K Joucken.
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Mont-Godinne (Catholic University of Louvain), Yvoir, Belgium.
- J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 1996 Dec 1;10(7):869-76.
ObjectiveTo compare intraoperative hemodynamics profiles and recovery characteristics of propofol-alfentanil with fentanyl-midazolam anesthesia in elective coronary artery surgery.DesignProspective, randomized study.SettingUniversity hospital.ParticipantsFifty patients with impaired or good left ventricular function.InterventionsIn group 1, (n = 25) anesthesia was induced with an infusion of propofol, 3 to 4 mg/kg/h, alfentanil, 500 micrograms, and pancuronium 0.1 mg/kg, and maintained with propofol, 3 to 6 mg/kg/h (variable rate), and alfentanil infusions, 30 micrograms/kg/h (fixed rate). Additional boluses of alfentanil, 1 mg, were administered before noxious stimuli; group 2 (n = 25) received a loading dose of fentanyl, 25 micrograms/kg, midazolam, 1.5 to 3 mg, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg for induction, followed by an infusion of fentanyl, 7 micrograms/kg/h, for maintenance. Additional boluses of midazolam (1.5 to 3 mg) and fentanyl (250 micrograms) were administered before noxious stimuli. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS. Cardiovascular parameters at eight intraoperative time points as well as time to extubation, morphine consumption, and pain scores were recorded. Induction of anesthesia was associated in both groups with a small but significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (1: 15 mmHg (15%); 2: 8 mmHg (8%) with significant decreases in cardiac index (1: 8%; 2: 8%) and left ventricular stroke work index (1: 24%; 2: 21%). Throughout surgery, hemodynamic profiles were comparable between groups except after intubation when the MAP was significantly lower in group 1 (75 +/- 12 mmHg) than in group 2 (89 +/- 17 mmHg). Group 1 required less inotropic support. Extubation was performed faster in group 1 (7.6 h) than in group 2 (18.0 h). Morphine requirements and pain scores were comparable between groups.ConclusionsPropofol-alfentanil anesthesia provides good intraoperative hemodynamics and allows early extubation after coronary artery surgery.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.