• V Wenzel, K H Lindner, A W Prengel, C Maier, W Voelckel, K G Lurie, and H U Strohmenger.
• Department of Anesthesiology, University of Ulm, Germany.
• Crit. Care Med. 1999 Mar 1;27(3):486-92.

ObjectiveAlthough a benefit of vasopressin when compared with epinephrine was shown during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after a short duration of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest, the effect of vasopressin during prolonged cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity is currently unknown.DesignProspective, randomized laboratory investigation using an established porcine model with instrumentation for measurement of hemodynamic variables, vital organ blood flow, blood gases, and return of spontaneous circulation.SettingUniversity hospital laboratory.SubjectsEighteen domestic pigs.InterventionsAfter 15 mins of cardiac arrest and 3 mins of chest compressions, 18 animals were randomly treated with either 0.8 units/kg vasopressin (n = 9) or 200 microg/kg epinephrine (n = 9).Measurements And Main ResultsCompared with epinephrine, vasopressin resulted, at both 90 secs and 5 mins after drug administration, in significantly higher (p < .05) median (25th-75th percentiles) left ventricular myocardial blood flow (120 [range, 96-193] vs. 54 [range, 11-92] and 56 [range, 41-80] vs. 21 [range, 11-40] mL/min/100 g, respectively) and total cerebral blood flow (85 [78-102] vs. 24 [18-41] and 50 [44-52] vs. 8 [5-23] mL/min/100 g, respectively). Spontaneous circulation was restored in eight of nine animals in the vasopressin group and in one of nine animals in the epinephrine group (p = .003).ConclusionsCompared with a maximum dose of epinephrine, vasopressin significantly increased left ventricular myocardial and total cerebral blood flow during CPR and return of spontaneous circulation in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest with postcountershock pulseless electrical activity.

26 keywords...

hide…