• Annals of surgery · Jan 2012

    Use of mesh during ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases: outcomes of 33,832 cases.

    • Jacqueline J Choi, Nandini C Palaniappa, Kai B Dallas, Tamara B Rudich, Modesto J Colon, and Celia M Divino.
    • Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, USA.
    • Ann. Surg. 2012 Jan 1;255(1):176-80.

    ObjectiveTo analyze and compare postoperative occurrences following ventral hernia repairs (VHRs) using mesh in clean-contaminated and contaminated wounds.BackgroundVentral hernia repairs using mesh is one of the most common surgical procedures performed. However, guidelines and outcomes of repairs in clean-contaminated or grossly contaminated ventral hernias have not been established.MethodsPatients who underwent VHR with mesh between the dates January 1, 2005 and April 4, 2010 at all hospitals in the United States participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) were reviewed. Data from 33,832 patients were analyzed by field contamination level and then compared with data from patients who underwent VHR without mesh. Data were analyzed using the odds ratio test with a 95% confidence interval.ResultsThe odds of having one or more postoperative occurrences were significantly greater in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases using mesh when compared with clean cases, with odds ratios of 3.56 (3.25-3.89) and 5.05 (1.78-12.41), respectively. There was a significantly increased risk of superficial surgical site infections (SSI) (2.53), deep SSI (3.09) and organ/space SSI (6.16), wound disruption (4.41), pneumonia (4.43), and sepsis (4.90) for clean-contaminated cases. Both clean-contaminated and contaminated cases had an increased risk of septic shock (5.82 and 26.74, respectively), and need for ventilator for more than 48 hours (5.59 and 26.76, respectively). In addition, there was a significantly increased odds ratio of complications in patients who underwent VHR with mesh (3.56) to nonmesh (2.52) in clean-contaminated cases.ConclusionThere is a significant increase in risk of postoperative occurrences following VHRs using mesh in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases relative to clean cases. We recommend avoiding the use of mesh in any level of contamination.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.