• Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Feb 1998

    Comparative Study

    Arthrodesis versus resection arthroplasty for failed hallux valgus operations.

    • H B Kitaoka and G L Patzer.
    • Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
    • Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998 Feb 1(347):208-14.

    AbstractThe results for 18 patients (20 feet) in whom a hallux valgus procedure had failed were reviewed. Ten patients (11 feet), with a mean age of 63 years, had correction with Keller resection arthroplasty and were observed for an average of 10 years (range, 3-15 years). The hallux valgus angle improved an average of 11 degrees +/- 3 degrees, and the intermetatarsal angle improved an average of 2 degrees +/- 1.7 degrees. Results were good in six feet, fair in four, and poor in one. Eight patients (nine feet), with a mean age of 63 years, had correction with arthrodesis and were observed for an average of 5 years (range, 2-8 years). The hallux valgus angle improved an average of 23 degrees +/- 6.9 degrees, and the intermetatarsal angle improved an average of 2 degrees +/- 3 degrees. Results were good in six feet, fair in two, and poor in one. There were differences between the two operations in terms of patient satisfaction, pain relief, appearance, and footwear. The incidence of metatarsalgia was similar for the two groups. Complications, particularly malalignment, were more common in the resection group. None of the patients required additional revision operation. Resection arthroplasty is a simple procedure and does not require cast immobilization. Resection arthroplasty and arthrodesis are reasonable options for salvage treatment of failed hallux valgus operations in older patients because good results were achieved in six of nine (67%) feet after arthrodesis and in six of 11 (54%) feet after resection.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…