• Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging · Jun 2013

    Comparative Study

    Site-dependency of the E/e' ratio in predicting invasive left ventricular filling pressure in patients with suspected or ascertained coronary artery disease.

    • Maurizio Galderisi, Antonio Rapacciuolo, Roberta Esposito, Marco Versiero, Vincenzo Schiano-Lomoriello, Ciro Santoro, Federico Piscione, and Giovanni de Simone.
    • Laboratory of Echocardiography, Cardioangiology Unit with CCU, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Federico II University Hospital, Via S. Pansini 80131 Naples, Italy. mgalderi@unina.it
    • Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jun 1;14(6):555-61.

    PurposeTo test the accuracy of different mitral annular sites of the E/e' ratio in predicting invasive left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) in patients hospitalized for coronary artery disease (CAD).MethodsForty-one patients with suspected or ascertained chronic CAD underwent non-invasive estimation of LVFP the same day as coronary angiography combined with right catheterization for pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) assessment. The ratio between E velocity and early diastolic velocity of the mitral annulus (e') was calculated as a surrogate of PWCP by (i) averaging septal and lateral e' (E/e'A2); (ii) averaging septal, lateral, inferior, anterior (E/e'A4); (iii) using the sole septal (E/e'S); or (iv) lateral annulus (E/e'L). Patients were divided in two groups according to the PCWP: 25 with the PCWP <18 mmHg and 16 with the PCWP ≥ 18 mmHg.ResultsThe two groups were comparable for gender, body mass index, blood pressure, heart rate (HR), E/A ratio, and deceleration time. The ejection fraction (EF) was lower and left atrial volume index (LAVi) greater (both P < 0.02) in patients with the PCWP ≥ 18 mmHg. They also exhibited higher E/e'S (P < 0.05), E/e'L (P < 0.0001), E/e'A2, and E/e'A4 (both P < 0.005) than patients with the PCWP <18 mmHg. In pooled groups, after adjusting for HR EF and LAVi, E/e'L (β = 0.42, P < 0.01), E/e'A2 (β = 0.32, P < 0.05), and E/e'A4 (β = 0.31, P < 0.05) were all independently associated with PWCP. E/e'L ≥ 16.2 predicted PCWP ≥18 mmHg with the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.826), sensitivity (81.3%), and specificity (80%).ConclusionsIn patients with CAD, E/e'L is the most accurate parameter in predicting abnormally increased LVFP.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.