• Frances S Shofer, Mary Calderone, Judd E Hollander, Kristy M Walsh, Christopher S Decker, and Jeffrey A Le.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
• Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun 1;30(5):639-42.

ObjectiveYoung patients are at low risk for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS); however, many of these patients still enter a "rule-out ACS" pathway and receive stress testing. We hypothesized that stress testing in patients younger than 40 years without known coronary disease will not identify patients at high risk for 30-day adverse cardiovascular events.MethodsWe conducted a cohort study of patients younger than 40 years evaluated in the emergency department for potential ACS. Patients were excluded if they used cocaine, had known cardiac disease, or had an abnormal electrocardiogram. Patients were followed up in-house; follow-up was performed by direct telephone contact and medical record review. The main outcome was a composite of death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and revascularization at 30 days. Comparisons between patients with and without stress testing were done using χ2 or t test, as appropriate; 95% confidence intervals were reported for the main outcomes.ResultsOf 8816 patient visits, 1144 patients met inclusion criteria. Within 30 days, 82 patients (7.2%) received stress testing, 2 of whom led to cardiac catheterization. Death (n=2), AMI (n=3), and revascularization (n=1) were not different between patients who did and did not receive stress testing (2.4% [0.2%-8.5%] vs 0.4% [0.1%-1.0%]).ConclusionThe 30-day cardiovascular complication rate is not different between young patients without known heart disease who do and do not receive stress testing when they present with symptoms of a potential ACS. Testing of young patients at low risk for disease should be reconsidered.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

14 keywords...

hide…