• Johannes C Schrama, Birgitte Espehaug, Geir Hallan, Lars B Engesaeter, Ove Furnes, Leif I Havelin, and Bjorg-Tilde S Fevang.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital and Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Bergen, Norway. johannes.schrama@helse-bergen.no
• Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Apr 1;62(4):473-9.

ObjectiveTo compare differences in the risk of revision for infection and changes in risk over time and in time from primary surgery to revision for infection after total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) patients.MethodsIn the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 6,629 and 102,157 primary total joint replacements in patients with RA and OA, respectively, were identified from 1987 (1994 for knees) until 2008. Survival analyses with revision due to infection as the end point were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods for constructing survival curves and multiple Cox regression to calculate relative risk (RR) estimates for diagnosis, age, sex, and year of primary surgery. An extended Cox model was used to estimate RR within different followup intervals.ResultsRA patients with TKR had a 1.6 times higher risk of revision for infection than OA patients, whereas there was no difference in the THRs. In the THRs, we found a higher risk of revision for infection from 2001 onward, whereas the development for TKRs was the opposite. These time effects affected the RA and OA groups equally. The risk of revision for infection from 6 years postoperatively on was higher in RA patients.ConclusionThe overall risk of revision for infection after TKR was higher in RA patients. The risk of late infection leading to revision of the TKR and THR was higher in RA patients than in OA patients. After the year 2000, the RR of revision for infection in RA compared with OA remained unchanged.

27 keywords...

hide…