• Spine · Mar 2007

    Modified paramedian transpedicular approach and spinal reconstruction for intradural tumors of the cervical and cervicothoracic spine: clinical experience.

    • Frank L Acosta, Henry E Aryan, John Chi, Andrew T Parsa, and Christopher P Ames.
    • Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0112, USA.
    • Spine. 2007 Mar 15;32(6):E203-10.

    Study DesignRetrospective review of the medical, radiographic, surgical, and postoperative records of patients who underwent resection of multilevel intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors of the ventral cervical and cervicothoracic spine via a modified paramedian transpedicular approach at the University of California, San Francisco, between 2003 and 2005.ObjectiveTo assess the surgical, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of using the modified paramedian transpedicular approach to resect ventral intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors of the ventral cervical and cervicothoracic spine.Summary Of Background DataA common theme of skull-base surgery for many years has been to remove the bone rather than retract neural elements. In this report, we demonstrate some possible advantages of taking a "spine-base" approach for resecting intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors of the ventral cervical and cervicothoracic spinal canal, and present our clinical experience.MethodsAll medical, surgical, and radiologic records were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcome was assessed for disability via the Neck Disability Index and for pain via the visual analog scale.ResultsFourteen patients (4 males and 10 females, average age 39.6 years, range 20-62) with intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors involving multiple levels of the anterior cervical and cervicothoracic spine were identified. All patients presented with pain and/or radiculomyelopathy attributed to a ventral intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor of the cervical or cervicothoracic spine that was resected via the modified paramedian transpedicular approach with partial dorsal corpectomy and posterior spinal reconstruction. The average follow-up period was 14.6 months (range 5-30). Gross total resection was achieved in all cases, and no patient required additional surgery via an anterior approach for residual tumor.ConclusionsThe modified paramedian transpedicular approach with partial dorsal corpectomy we describe here is a variation of traditional thoracic posterolateral transpedicular extracavitary approaches and offers direct access to lesions of the ventral cervicothoracic spinal canal. This approach avoids the morbidity of anterior transcervical, transoral, or transthoracic procedures, while providing a view of the entire ventral cervicothoracic canal, and can be performed safely and effectively in select patients.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.