• Steven L Shein, John T Gallagher, Kathleen M Deakins, and Dayna M Weinert.
• Division of Critical Care Medicine, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, and the Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. steven.shein@uhhospitals.org.
• Respir Care. 2016 May 1; 61 (5): 586-92.

BackgroundMucolytic agents, such as nebulized hypertonic saline, may improve airway clearance and shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation, but prospective blinded studies in children undergoing mechanical ventilation are lacking.MethodsChildren <18 y old who had been intubated for <12 h and had an expected duration of mechanical ventilation of >48 additional h were prophylactically given 3 mL of either nebulized hypertonic saline or placebo (0.9% saline) 4 times/d. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation. Ventilator parameters and the presence of wheezing were recorded before and after study drug administration.ResultsThe duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly longer in children treated with hypertonic saline (208.1 [interquartile range 136.3-319.8] h) versus those treated with placebo (129.5 [interquartile range 74.4-146.1] h) (P = .03 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test). After adjusting for baseline levels of PEEP, the duration of mechanical ventilation did not differ between groups. Mechanical ventilation parameters, including dead space and dynamic compliance, did not differ between measurements taken before study drug administration versus measurements taken after. New onset wheezing following study drug administration was rare (1.0% with hypertonic saline vs 3.0% with placebo, P = .36 by chi-square test).ConclusionsAdministering prophylactic nebulized hypertonic saline to mechanically ventilated children did not improve clinically relevant outcomes, including duration of mechanical ventilation. Wheezing after hypertonic saline treatment was rare.Copyright © 2016 by Daedalus Enterprises.

21 keywords...

hide…