• S Thorn, P Attali, J M Boulenc, M Gladin, J P Monassier, G Roul, C Sussmann, M Zaehringer, R Zelinsky, and M Zupan.
• Service médical, 2, rue Schumann, BP 372, 74012 Annecy Cedex. sylvie.thorn@elsm-strasbourg.cnamts.fr
• Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2007 Jan 1;100(1):7-12.

Objectiveto determine the time delay from symptom onset to diagnosis and treatment of patients with persistant ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Designprospective observational study.Methodpatients with symptoms onset < 24 h admitted in all 10 cardiac intensive care units in one French administrative region (Alsace). Data were recorded by doctors on duty soon after hospital admission. Patients with STEMI during hospital stay or as a complication of cardiac interventional procedure were excluded. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess statistical differences between the groups (p value < 0.05).Resultfrom April to October 2004, 326 patients were admitted for STEMI. Median time between the symptoms onset and the patient's call for medical help was 60 minutes. General practitioners were the first medical contact in 41%. The time from symptoms onset to first medical intervention and from first medical intervention to coronary care unit admission were markedly shorter in patients who had directly called the Emergency Medical Services (group 15-110 patients i.e. 33% of the study population): 44 min vs 75 min otherwise (p=0,003). Median transport time was 60 min. Sixty two percent of the pts were transported by the Emergency Medical Services. The median time from symptoms onset to initiation of reperfusion therapy was 240 min. It was significantly lower in group 15 (170 min vs 286 min - p < 0,001) and for thrombolytic therapy (190 min versus 245 min for primary angioplasty, p=0,007). When thrombolysis (THL) was used, 89% of the pts could be treated during 6 hours of symptoms onset and 44% in 3 hours. For angioplasty only 4% of the pts were treated in the first 90 minutes, 9% in the 2 hours and 30% in the 3 hours of symptoms onset. If the time delay is evaluated from the 1 st medical intervention, call to reperfusion intervention was significatly shorter for THL: 91 versus 157 min, p< 0,003. Angioplasty represented 75% of reperfusion strategy in our area and THL alone only 2,7% and combine therapy 5,4%.Conclusionour study documents the beneficial effect of a direct call to Emergency Medical Services. Our results also underscore the need for an effort to reduce the time to offer the best appropriate reperfusion techniques in STEMI pts: speed up the admission in the cath-lab, think about pre-hospital thrombolysis followed by coronary angioplasty if necessary.

24 keywords...

hide…